新西兰被路上的大狗咬伤了
在新西兰
昨天我走在路上被一家的狗咬了，没有原因突然冲出来咬我，然后我在等我朋友过来带我去医院的时候，那还试图围栏底下钻出来咬我，特别凶。伤口破皮了也有血冒出来也肿起来了。然后我就去买了瓶水稍微冲了一下然后去看医生了，医生说这边没有狂犬疫苗，后来只打了破伤风，开了抗生素。想问下，这么疯狂的狗真的没有狂犬病吗*
评论
没有。投诉给council会处理掉的。。
评论
赶紧上council投诉，这个狗得送去人道毁灭。
评论
https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt ... aint-about-dog.aspx J1 s w8 x+ \, B* t0 R. ]
/ h/ n, z. t) k+ k ?
Urgent complaints - call us on 0800 462 685
评论
https://www.aucklandcouncil.govt ... dangerous-dogs.aspx
下面有具体内容
Dogs causing harm
For details on rules and penalties regarding dogs causing harm, see the relevant section from the Dog Control Act 1996.1 W7 E' e' `3 _
Dogs attacking persons or animals- ^1 s$ d/ ?" r( k% D
Dogs rushing at persons, animals or vehicles- }8 t( `( r& A- U
Dogs causing serious injury9 I5 L" V6 s7 p! A& l' g
评论
57 Dogs attacking persons or animals. P' `0 J; l; E" Q/ C
(1)
A person may, for the purpose of stopping an attack, seize or destroy a dog if—
(a)+ ~2 \. ?7 r9 o, t; b2 V6 s+ _
the person is attacked by the dog; or5 M+ W7 M, o* \. M) w" M9 P' ?1 A
(b)
the person witnesses the dog attacking any other person, or any stock, poultry, domestic animal, or protected wildlife.
(2)* g3 G6 o: m; a* h
The owner of a dog that makes an attack described in subsection (1) commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $3,000 in addition to any liability that he or she may incur for any damage caused by the attack." C( a( T- X8 B
(3)
If, in any proceedings under subsection (2), the court is satisfied that the dog has committed an attack described in subsection (1) and that the dog has not been destroyed, the court must make an order for the destruction of the dog unless it is satisfied that the circumstances of the offence were exceptional and do not warrant destruction of the dog.
(4)
If a person seizes a dog under subsection (1), he or she must, as soon as practicable, deliver the dog into the custody of a dog ranger or dog control officer.
(5)
If a dog control officer or dog ranger has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed under subsection (2), he or she may—
(a)+ A; _8 X# D ]8 t
seize and take custody of the dog; or. A2 D3 }& B- N4 _3 L
(b)
if seizure of the dog is not practicable, destroy the dog.
(6)
A dog control officer or dog ranger may enter land or premises for the purposes of subsection (5), but may enter any dwellinghouse on the land or premises only if—; `! s4 U" B$ S. V
(a)* Z8 x8 e8 I7 @& F; {. h
he or she is in fresh pursuit of a dog that—3 ?+ V. G: ]/ Y( j+ l
(i)
he or she has reasonable grounds to believe has committed an attack described in subsection (1); and9 L9 h. u( e5 F% h, Q9 M. T' m/ l
(ii)
has been identified by a witness to the attack; or- w& J& H B3 e% Y+ b
(b)9 d2 M! W9 j. \; y; i9 n
he or she is authorised to enter by a warrant issued by an issuing officer (within the meaning of section 3 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012), made on application by the dog ranger or dog control officer in the manner provided for an application for a search warrant in subpart 3 of Part 4 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012, who must not issue a warrant unless the issuing officer is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed under subsection (2), and, in the case of a dog control officer, he or she is accompanied by a constable.9 [) k, o( L; v) t: {4 v( ~
(6A)
None of the following persons may act as an issuing officer under this section:
(a)! }8 q5 _7 V- w# d# B
the mayor or any elected member of the local authority that employs or engages the dog ranger or dog control officer; or
(b)
any employee of the local authority that employs or engages the dog ranger or dog control officer.
(6B)
The provisions of subparts 1, 3, 7, 9, and 10 of Part 4 of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 apply in respect of an authority applied for or issued under subsection (6).6 b8 `7 U: I: ?, ?3 A1 C. ?
(7)
To avoid doubt, a constable may exercise the powers conferred on a dog control officer or dog ranger by this section.
(8)* m4 ~' W9 |: h. Q, V
This section, section 57A, and section 58 do not apply in respect of a dog that—
(a)) W k# j; k, k) t- c7 G
is kept, or is being used, or is certified for use by a specified agency; and
(b)
is being used for the purpose of carrying out in a lawful manner any function, duty, or power of that agency.
Compare: 1982 No 42 s 56(1)–(5), (7)
Section 57: substituted, on 1 December 2003, by section 35 of the Dog Control Amendment Act 2003 (2003 No 119).6 Q1 n7 i0 Q ]; R: i
Section 57(2): amended, on 1 July 2013, by section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (2011 No 81).+ [8 K: e' ^: h3 D: D1 M
Section 57(6)(b): amended, on 1 October 2012, by section 233(4) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24). i- I, H. z# K( ?5 V) g) z
Section 57(6A): inserted, on 1 October 2012, by section 233(5) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).; o5 l' y9 [8 G& E( ^$ ^7 S* _+ `
Section 57(6B): inserted, on 1 October 2012, by section 233(5) of the Search and Surveillance Act 2012 (2012 No 24).
Section 57(7): amended, on 1 October 2008, pursuant to section 116(a)(ii) of the Policing Act 2008 (2008 No 72).3 o" p2 Z8 U4 a9 P
评论
57A Dogs rushing at persons, animals, or vehicles' I' C- T$ G6 I( Q1 q# O
(1)
This section applies to a dog in a public place that—
(a)
rushes at, or startles, any person or animal in a manner that causes—
(i)8 `6 M4 H6 |5 D
any person to be killed, injured, or endangered; or3 D: c. L. H$ ^ E5 q/ l; }
(ii)- }8 L7 H; d! Z$ C
any property to be damaged or endangered; or
(b)
rushes at any vehicle in a manner that causes, or is likely to cause, an accident.
(2)6 K+ z7 D* Y. F! @% Z0 E( D
If this section applies,—
(a)
the owner of the dog commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding $3,000 in addition to any liability that he or she may incur for any damage caused by the dog; and
(b)! @5 ?, i$ ?. f( `4 a+ E
the court may make an order for the destruction of the dog.
(3)( ^& g4 {' {8 w6 h& E0 q
A dog control officer or dog ranger who has reasonable grounds to believe that an offence has been committed under subsection (2)(a) may, at any time before a decision of the court under that subsection, seize or take custody of the dog and may enter any land or premises (except a dwellinghouse) to do so." d- W( z( J" f2 i5 h
Section 57A: inserted, on 1 December 2003, by section 36 of the Dog Control Amendment Act 2003 (2003 No 119).
Section 57A(2)(a): amended, on 1 July 2013, by section 413 of the Criminal Procedure Act 2011 (2011 No 81).
评论
58 Dogs causing serious injury
The owner of any dog that attacks any person or any protected wildlife and causes—
(a)1 j+ V! _# s- I0 b/ I0 D2 W1 B4 z0 y
serious injury to any person; or
(b): l( E+ b. d# \7 ~5 R
the death of any protected wildlife; or1 I& R# w e( k2 }+ W/ y. T
(c)2 A$ W$ m" A% V
such injury to any protected wildlife that it becomes necessary to destroy the animal to terminate its suffering,—
commits an offence and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $20,000, or both, and the court shall, on convicting the owner, make an order for the destruction of the dog unless satisfied that the circumstances of the attack were exceptional and do not justify destruction. V7 _$ M0 N% |2 D+ Q! C X0 x
Section 58: amended, on 1 December 2003, by section 37 of the Dog Control Amendment Act 2003 (2003 No 119).
评论
http://www.legislation.govt.nz/a ... hole.html#DLM375415
8 t. N0 [8 z3 N! D) _, q, e
5 K, t. N, [+ S7 q% e# @/ c
有时间学习一下哦。。
评论
这狗已经见红了，以后肯定见你一次咬你一次。
评论
0 g; t! B% j; a4 p
么奶妹就是体贴
评论
记得下次走路的时候带把刀，自我防卫一下。
评论
炖了吃狗肉火锅把。。。。。
评论
这个要赶快去city council投诉，这种狗必须处理掉不然太大的安全隐患了
评论
没有狂犬病菌这边
评论
打个破伤风吧 如果担心的话 狂犬病没必要的哈～