澳洲北京指控澳洲在南海挑衅，滥用中国的克制

在澳大利亚澳洲新闻



中国指控澳洲在南海挑衅，并说澳洲 - 连同美加 - 必须“不要滥用中国的克制”。

外交部发言人汪文斌回答关于最近在南海军事遭遇的问题 - 包括Politico关于一架中国战机与一架美军C-130飞机的“不安全”和“不专业”交互的报道。

Politico 报道说这个交会发生于中国对澳洲和加拿大飞机更为激进的军事行为中。

就在澳洲5月大选后，一架澳洲皇家空军RAAF P-8还是侦察机被一架中国战机拦截，总理阿尔巴尼斯称之为“激进和危险举动”。

汪的言论被发表在《环球时报》上。

该报援引汪的话说：“我们。。。敦促各方尊重事实，不要滥用中方的克制，立刻停止以执行联合国安理会决议的名义危及中国国家主权和安全的行为。”

《环球时报》报道说汪之前说过这些行为是对中国的“彻底挑衅”。

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jul/18/abusing-chinas-restraint-beijing-accuses-australia-of-provocation-at-sea

评论
关系刚刚好点

评论
澳洲加油，协防台海

评论

英文新闻中没有翻译的部分：

Relations between Australia and China have shown some signs of a thaw, particularly after the foreign affairs minister, Penny Wong, met her Chinese counterpart, Wang Yi, in Bali earlier this month.

However, tensions remain over trade, as well as China’s militarisation in the South China Sea, the artificial islands it has built and its claims to territory contested by other Asian nations.

The US regularly runs freedom of navigation operations (Fonops) in the region, as it does all over the world to challenge other countries’ claims to territorial rights.

It has put some pressure on Australia to do the same. But Australia, while it regularly exercises its right to send warships and planes through the area (which covers critical trade routes), does not venture within 12 nautical miles of territory claimed by China.

Some have speculated that something closer to a US-style program could begin under the new defence minister, Richard Marles. Donald Rothwell, an international law professor at the Australian National University, said the ministerial language has become more assertive.

In response to an ABC story earlier this month about an Australian warship being tracked by a Chinese submarine, Marles declined to address the incident but said Australia routinely sent warships.

“It’s been doing it for decades, and it is focused on asserting the UN convention on the law of the sea: freedom of navigation, freedom of overflight, the global rules-based order, which I’ve been describing as being so important for our national interest,” he said.

Australian Foreign Minister Penny Wong meets with Chinese Foreign Minister Wang at a bilateral meeting during the the G20 Foreign Ministers' Meeting at Nusa Dua in South Kuta, Bali, Indonesia, Friday, July 8, 2022. (AAP Image/Pool, Johannes P. Christo) NO ARCHIVING
China says relationship with Australia ready to ‘set sail again’ amid hopes coal import ban will be scrapped
Read more
Rothwell said the statement seemed like a “hardening” of the language. “We’ve never formally conducted Fonops like the US,” he said. “But now we’re actively ‘asserting’, because we believe we can do that under the law of the sea convention.”

Ben Scott, the director of the Australia’s Security and the Rules-Based Order Project at the Lowy Institute, agreed, saying usually a minister would use the word “exercise” freedom, rather than “assert”.

“If you compare what he’s said with what Defence has said officially, his take has been much more front-footed,” Scott said.

He also noted that in opposition Marles had called for Australia to start Fonops.

In 2016, Marles said the navy and air force should be authorised to conduct freedom of navigation exercises in the South China Sea, including within 12 nautical miles of the artificial islands China has built there.

“It is important that we are asserting our rights to navigate the high seas under international law,” he told the Sydney Morning Herald.

Marles has been contacted for comment.

John Blaxland, a professor of international security and intelligence studies at the Australian National University, said it was important that Australia continued its existing missions because “if you don’t exercise a right, you eventually forfeit it”. But he said Australia’s approach was “consistent” and had been so for 40 years.

“We appreciate we’re potentially a target if we stick our heads too far above the parapet,” he said.

While Australia has been consistent, China keeps expanding the size of the zone it claims, including by its so-called nine-dash line.

“China’s trying to scare away, intimidate away, these rights of navigation, rights of transit,” Blaxland said.

评论

澳洲是个被美国完全渗透的国家，中澳摩擦符合美国精英集团利益

评论
忍无可忍，无需再忍，洪哥，你倒是动手啊！

评论
统一之后谁执政？是民选还是一党执政？一国两制？

评论
该报援引汪的话说：“我们。。。敦促各方尊重事实，不要滥用中方的克制，立刻停止以执行联合国安理会决议的名义危及中国国家主权和安全的行为。”

发言人说的中方的克制，是什么？

评论
说别人的话 让别人无话可说。

评论
澳洲跑那么远干什么，把自己的事情先搞好吧。教师的薪水这么低，有钱提高一下教师待遇不好？

评论
断交吧，大家都不要这么不开心啦

评论

当然，责任都在澳方。

评论

防止华人打华人。

澳洲教师薪水不低。

评论
【澳财长称如果中方放松对澳煤炭输华限制将是重要一步 外交部回应】财联社7月18日电，澳大利亚财长查尔莫斯17日在接受采访时表示，如果中国政府放松对澳大利亚煤炭输华的限制，将会是重要一步。对此，中国外交部发言人汪文斌18日在外交部例行记者会上回应相关问询时重申，中方对于同包括澳大利亚在内的各国开展务实合作的立场是一贯明确的。中方希望澳方抓住两国关系出现的契机，付诸实际行动重塑对华正确认知，本着相互尊重互利共赢的原则处理中澳经贸关系，同中方相向而行，为改善中澳关系减少负资产、积累正能量，为中澳经贸关系健康稳定发展创造有利条件。

评论
老共对外一直就太过软弱了，军舰近岸12海里内就是侵略了不是吗？澳洲想过老共如果将来也来近岸12海里会怎么样？四十年了？笑话，以为中国人永远就配澳洲潜艇随意进入黄浦江口的窝囊样，明显盎格鲁霸权思想作怪。不是中共当政话，说不定当场就当场被
击沉了。

评论
有本事把那艘小护卫舰开到俄罗斯领海边缘试试

评论


无奈黄俄太软弱，比起其俄爹差多了，要没有中国传统文化和祖宗的统一大市场把经济搞起来，估计中国人天天都要被人骑在头上拉屎

评论

中共以前也硬过，1949年解放军炮击紫石英号，英美军舰从此再也不敢进入长江

评论
Never a fan of 中共，对外太软，隐忍，对内管控太严，限制国人发展。差评。

评论
别多废话，反正自家船也多，也开条军舰来澳大利亚和美国12海里以内“自由航行”一下，看看人家啥反应，或者直接击沉任何进入中方宣称领海范围内的军舰和战机吧。

评论
上有很多精神上的盎格鲁撒克逊

评论


就是，老共只会抗议，比清廷都弱，看得都恶心

评论
虽然老共对外软弱，但是对内强硬啊，收拾起韭菜来那是雷厉风行，铁面无私

评论

对内残忍，对外隐忍，老共秘诀

评论
我就发图不说话

澳洲中文论坛热点