澳洲耶伦证词偏鸽派:通胀是一大不确定因素 未来加

在澳大利亚证券外汇




7月12日,美联储主席耶伦在国会证词书面讲稿公布,耶伦称通胀对经济状况的反应是一大不确定因素,利率无需进一步升高太多即可达到中性状态。

针对近期较为疲软的通胀数据,耶伦在书面讲稿中指出,美联储密切关注通胀进展,对通胀持续低于2%的目标保持警惕,最近通胀稍有下降的部分原因在于有些项目价格出现异常下滑,这一表态与多数联储官员在6月FOMC会议的观点一致。耶伦强调,通胀是一大不确定性因素。

耶伦还认为,美国经济在二季度升温,预计经济在未来将继续温和增长,当前经济路径为进一步加息提供依据,利率无需进一步升高太多即可达到中性状态。未来几年则需要额外的渐进式加息。

至于缩表,耶伦的态度一如6月FOMC会议,称将在年内开始缩表,但表示资产负债表的最终规模暂未确定,还称不会将资产负债表用作主动政策工具。当月会议纪要显示,联储官员在何时启动缩表问题上存在意见分歧,并没有透露缩表启动的具体时间。证词公布前,瑞银报告称缩表细节可能在7月会议中决定。

耶伦书面证词基本符合市场预期,措辞偏鸽派,对通胀表示担忧,认为加息空间不大。分析认为,除非耶伦在问答环节给市场一个“惊喜”,十年期国债收益率不会变动太多。法巴银行Mortimer-Lee指出,耶伦证词意味着美联储9月不会行动。

北京时间周三22时,美联储主席耶伦将出席众议院听证会,随后则是与议员的问答环节;周四22时,耶伦还将出席参议院听证会。考虑到特朗普提名耶伦连任的可能性越来越小,这可能是耶伦任内最后一次在众议院金融服务委员会发表半年一次的汉弗莱-霍金斯证词。若耶伦不连任,其任期将在2018年2月结束。

Chairman Hensarling, Ranking Member Waters, and other members of the Committee, I am pleased to present the Federal Reserve’s semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress. In my remarks today I will briefly discuss the current economic situation and outlook before turning to monetary policy.

Current Economic Situation and Outlook

Since my appearance before this committee in February, the labor market has continued to strengthen. Job gains have averaged 180,000 per month so far this year, down only slightly from the average in 2016 and still well above the pace we estimate would be sufficient, on average, to provide jobs for new entrants to the labor force. Indeed, the unemployment rate has fallen about 1/4 percentage point since the start of the year, and, at 4.4 percent in June, is 5-1/2 percentage points below its peak in 2010 and modestly below the median of Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) participants’ assessments of its longer-run normal level. The labor force participation rate has changed little, on net, this year--another indication of improving conditions in the jobs market, given the demographically driven downward trend in this series. A broader measure of labor market slack that includes workers marginally attached to the labor force and those working part time who would prefer full-time work has also fallen this year and is now nearly as low as it was just before the recession. It is also encouraging that jobless rates have continued to decline for most major demographic groups, including for African Americans and Hispanics. However, as before the recession, unemployment rates for these minority groups remain higher than for the nation overall.

Meanwhile, the economy appears to have grown at a moderate pace, on average, so far this year. Although inflation-adjusted gross domestic product is currently estimated to have increased at an annual rate of only 1-1/2 percent in the first quarter, more-recent indicators suggest that growth rebounded in the second quarter. In particular, growth in household spending, which was weak earlier in the year, has picked up in recent months and continues to be supported by job gains, rising household wealth, and favorable consumer sentiment. In addition, business fixed investment has turned up this year after having been soft last year. And a strengthening in economic growth abroad has provided important support for U.S. manufacturing production and exports. The housing market has continued to recover gradually, aided by the ongoing improvement in the labor market and mortgage rates that, although up somewhat from a year ago, remain at relatively low levels.

With regard to inflation, overall consumer prices, as measured by the price index for personal consumption expenditures, increased 1.4 percent over the 12 months ending in May, up from about 1 percent a year ago but a little lower than earlier this year. Core inflation, which excludes energy and food prices, has also edged down in recent months and was 1.4 percent in May, a couple of tenths below the year-earlier reading. It appears that the recent lower readings on inflation are partly the result of a few unusual reductions in certain categories of prices; these reductions will hold 12-month inflation down until they drop out of the calculation. Nevertheless, with inflation continuing to run below the Committee’s 2 percent longer-run objective, the FOMC indicated in its June statement that it intends to carefully monitor actual and expected progress toward our symmetric inflation goal.

Looking ahead, my colleagues on the FOMC and I expect that, with further gradual adjustments in the stance of monetary policy, the economy will continue to expand at a moderate pace over the next couple of years, with the job market strengthening somewhat further and inflation rising to 2 percent. This judgment reflects our view that monetary policy remains accommodative. Ongoing job gains should continue to support the growth of incomes and, therefore, consumer spending; global economic growth should support further gains in U.S. exports; and favorable financial conditions, coupled with the prospect of continued gains in domestic and foreign spending and the ongoing recovery in drilling activity, should continue to support business investment. These developments should increase resource utilization somewhat further, thereby fostering a stronger pace of wage and price increases.

Of course, considerable uncertainty always attends the economic outlook. There is, for example, uncertainty about when--and how much--inflation will respond to tightening resource utilization. Possible changes in fiscal and other government policies here in the United States represent another source of uncertainty. In addition, although the prospects for the global economy appear to have improved somewhat this year, a number of our trading partners continue to confront economic challenges. At present, I see roughly equal odds that the U.S. economy’s performance will be somewhat stronger or somewhat less strong than we currently project.

Monetary Policy

I will now turn to monetary policy. The FOMC seeks to foster maximum employment and price stability, as required by law. Over the first half of 2017, the Committee continued to gradually reduce the amount of monetary policy accommodation. Specifically, the FOMC raised the target range for the federal funds rate by 1/4 percentage point at both its March and June meetings, bringing the target to a range of 1 to 1-1/4 percent. In doing so, the Committee recognized the considerable progress the economy had made--and is expected to continue to make--toward our mandated objectives.

The Committee continues to expect that the evolution of the economy will warrant gradual increases in the federal funds rate over time to achieve and maintain maximum employment and stable prices. That expectation is based on our view that the federal funds rate remains somewhat below its neutral level--that is, the level of the federal funds rate that is neither expansionary nor contractionary and keeps the economy operating on an even keel. Because the neutral rate is currently quite low by historical standards, the federal funds rate would not have to rise all that much further to get to a neutral policy stance. But because we also anticipate that the factors that are currently holding down the neutral rate will diminish somewhat over time, additional gradual rate hikes are likely to be appropriate over the next few years to sustain the economic expansion and return inflation to our 2 percent goal. Even so, the Committee continues to anticipate that the longer-run neutral level of the federal funds rate is likely to remain below levels that prevailed in previous decades.

As I noted earlier, the economic outlook is always subject to considerable uncertainty, and monetary policy is not on a preset course. FOMC participants will adjust their assessments of the appropriate path for the federal funds rate in response to changes to their economic outlooks and to their judgments of the associated risks as informed by incoming data. In this regard, as we noted in the FOMC statement last month, inflation continues to run below our 2 percent objective and has declined recently; the Committee will be monitoring inflation developments closely in the months ahead.

In evaluating the stance of monetary policy, the FOMC routinely consults monetary policy rules that connect prescriptions for the policy rate with variables associated with our mandated objectives. However, such prescriptions cannot be applied in a mechanical way; their use requires careful judgments about the choice and measurement of the inputs into these rules, as well as the implications of the many considerations these rules do not take into account. I would like to note the discussion of simple monetary policy rules and their role in the Federal Reserve’s policy process that appears in our current Monetary Policy Report.

Balance Sheet Normalization

Let me now turn to our balance sheet. Last month the FOMC augmented its Policy Normalization Principles and Plans by providing additional details on the process that we will follow in normalizing the size of our balance sheet. The Committee intends to gradually reduce the Federal Reserve’s securities holdings by decreasing its reinvestment of the principal payments it receives from the securities held in the System Open Market Account. Specifically, such payments will be reinvested only to the extent that they exceed gradually rising caps. Initially, these caps will be set at relatively low levels to limit the volume of securities that private investors will have to absorb. The Committee currently expects that, provided the economy evolves broadly as anticipated, it will likely begin to implement the program this year.

Once we start to reduce our reinvestments, our securities holdings will gradually decline, as will the supply of reserve balances in the banking system. The longer-run normal level of reserve balances will depend on a number of as-yet-unknown factors, including the banking system’s future demand for reserves and the Committee’s future decisions about how to implement monetary policy most efficiently and effectively.
The Committee currently anticipates reducing the quantity of reserve balances to a level that is appreciably below recent levels but larger than before the financial crisis.

Finally, the Committee affirmed in June that changing the target range for the federal funds rate is our primary means of adjusting the stance of monetary policy. In other words, we do not intend to use the balance sheet as an active tool for monetary policy in normal times. However, the Committee would be prepared to resume reinvestments if a material deterioration in the economic outlook were to warrant a sizable reduction in the federal funds rate. More generally, the Committee would be prepared to use its full range of tools, including altering the size and composition of its balance sheet, if future economic conditions were to warrant a more accommodative monetary policy than can be achieved solely by reducing the federal funds rate.

Thank you. I would be pleased to take your questions.

评论
九月照样加息。缩表照样进行,不信瞧着。

评论
坐等大胸的点评

评论
她发言怎么完全没有考虑大胸弟的感受。

评论
有意思,低通胀

评论
关键各大投行都认为美联储对通胀估计过于乐观

评论

当初不这么说椰奶就失业了。

评论
加元加息了。好不快活。

评论
没想到刷得还挺快

评论
米国又不加了 哪加拿大这么急着加息不就又打脸了

评论

一般来说加拿大最近就这一次加息

评论

所以今天澳币就涨了。

评论
大波妹,你快来说几句啊,有人怼你了

评论

有种预感椰奶干不久了

评论

椰奶说她有生之年看不到金融危机了,立下了flag就怕要打脸了

评论

说不定她的意思是这波金融危机是过不去了,08年到现在都没有恢复常态,看来以后是常年危机,偶尔好转。。
澳洲中文论坛热点
悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年,华人区受影响!只能乘巴士(组图)
据《逐日电讯报》报导,从明年年中开始,因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
联邦政客们具有多少房产?
据本月早些时分报导,绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联

证券外汇

证券外汇

说说澳币汇率

澳大利亚澳洲是所有资源型国家中,政治体制最好的。 也是最好体制国家中,总体和人均资源最丰富的。 并且澳洲孤悬各大洲,安全性最高。 所以澳币在4.3-4.6之间可以随时把人民币换成澳币。 ...

证券外汇

澳大利亚“即将到来的”无现金社会

澳大利亚O.P.这篇文章经过编辑 许多新闻来源都出现了各种情况,Westpac 表示澳大利亚将在 2022 年成为一个完全无现金的社会,而其他金融专家预测该事件将比上述日期早几年发生。 然而,我发现 ...

证券外汇

更新租约和更换雇主

澳大利亚O.P. 您好, 我对任何在更换雇主和将您的新租赁包装安排转移给新雇主方面有经验的人感兴趣。 具体来说,如果您的新雇主没有与您的租赁提供商达成协议。您的新雇主是否愿意加入租 ...

证券外汇

汇款到巴厘岛

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好 我想将大约 3,000 美元汇入我住在巴厘岛的侄女的印度尼西亚银行账户。人们会推荐什么作为这样做的最佳方式(不管需要多长时间,首选能为她带来最多收益的选项)。 评论 ...

证券外汇

有 AFCA 调解程序的经验吗?

澳大利亚O.P. 您好, 我是一个复杂的 sim 交换骗局的受害者,该骗局导致我在一家澳大利亚银行的全部资金损失殆尽。我已与银行就欺诈交易提出异议,银行以他们没有造成损失为由拒绝赔偿。银 ...

证券外汇

更新的租赁计算

澳大利亚O.P. Novated Lease 公司如何计算租赁金额? 我收到了 Allianceleasing 的几份报价,我对他们的计算很困惑。我试过他们基于网络的租赁计算器,金额相差很大。他们从哪里获得车辆价格? 非常 ...

证券外汇

结束定期存款和利息

澳大利亚O.P. 一年前,我在一家银行开始了为期 5 年的定期存款,每季度支付 4.05%,最近注意到他们现在为相同的投资金额和付款期限提供 4.60% 的利率。我打电话给银行,询问他们是否会将我的 ...

证券外汇

固定期限结束后再融资

澳大利亚O.P. 如果使用政府计划以 5% 的定金购买房产,并且利率固定 3 年。一旦你脱离这个利率,我听说如果你的资产少于 20%,就不可能再融资。我的问题是,这是否仍然适用于以 5% 的存款而不 ...

证券外汇

税收减免和发票日期

澳大利亚O.P. 我的 IP 完成了维护工作,我今天(6 月 15 日)收到了发票。我是否可以在 7 月 1 日结清账单但仍然在 2022-2023 年申请税收减免,或者是否有必要在申请的财政年度(即 6 月 30 日之前 ...

证券外汇

没有存款要求的联合储蓄账户

澳大利亚O.P. 我正试图为我和我的妻子找到一个在线储蓄账户,以便为几个目标存钱。我找不到符合我们要求的: - 联名和访问 - 体面的利率(例如 4.5%) - 没有要求每个月存入金额(除非它只是 ...

证券外汇

结转优惠捐款和配偶

澳大利亚O.P. 妻子结转了优惠捐款。她可以把85%结转优惠供款的配偶供款给我吗? 评论 不能。 它们只适用于只有当你工作并赚取 ~50,000 美元或更多(粗略地说)时才真正有益。 评论 她不能让你 ...

证券外汇

ING vs Ubank vs UpBank

澳大利亚O.P. 大家好, 我目前在 ING 处理我的日常账户和储蓄账户。他们即将更改海外 ATM 回扣。虽然自从 covid 以来我没有出国旅行,但我打算重新开始。 对于这 3 家银行中哪一家最适合日常和 ...

证券外汇

AMP 银行现在连接到 NPP

澳大利亚O.P. 我今天登录时收到一条消息,好像他们现在已经启用了入站和出站 NPP 支付。 https://www.amp.com.au/banki ng/ways -to-bank/new-payments-platform AMP 银行已连接到新支付平台 (NPP),使我们的客户能够 ...

证券外汇

Xero 转 MYOB

澳大利亚O.P. 我们是一家小型企业,目前使用 Xero with Payroll 并且已经使用了很多很多年。今天我收到一封来自 Xero 的电子邮件,说价格又上涨了大约。 6 美元一个月。 Xero 好像只涨了一个月的价 ...

证券外汇

做空一家美国公司

澳大利亚O.P. 请原谅我对这件事的绝对无知 (可能术语有误等) 我知道可以押注/投资一只股票? 如果股票下跌,你就会受益(不知何故——我不明白其中的机制) 我的问题是 - 在澳大利亚有没 ...

证券外汇

已婚夫妇的资产混合

澳大利亚O.P. 嗨, 我已经结婚 20 年了。我的问题涉及 3 项资产,我想知道它们是否完全属于我。 a) 在我们结婚之前,我买了一个单位,并在 10 年前用租金收入还清了它。房子只以我的名字命名 ...

证券外汇

大额无抵押贷款

澳大利亚O.P. 嗨,金融大师, 需要您的建议。 我从四大银行中的一家获得了几笔房屋贷款。根据这种结构,我有几个股权经理账户。 大约 2 年前,我将所有贷款再融资给另一家贷方。 p> 旧贷方 ...