新州教育部，考后改制，咱们论坛沸腾了几日，就没动静了？
是公鸡拉屎开头硬呢？还是都有鱼一样的忘性？
昨晚处于好奇，问了俱乐部三个本届精英考生，他们的回答出奇的一致，‘都考完了改policy，是wrong的’。回答得都很平静，没有激动的情绪，也都没再多说别的。
这次教育部考完了才改政策的操作，是不是已经实现了对这批孩子们的无视和伤害？
无德无能无才的我，今早向教育部发了个邮件，就告诉他们，
我们一些家长，及一些本届考生孩子们，认为你们 ‘考完了才改政策是错的，家长们相信你们的这个做法已经给部分考生心理造成了伤害，请你们考虑中止执行’。
跟我想法一样的家长，无论你的孩子是本届、往届、未来一届，就麻烦给教育部发个邮件，不用长篇大论，向我一样两三句话就足够了，为孩子们发个声。他们收到的邮件多了，就会少一些一意孤行，多一些思考，帮助他们做出更周密的win win政策，让孩子们只受益、不受害。
[email protected]
凡是为孩子发声的，请跟帖，我都给你们加分，每天来加，不够分就次日补上，本届学生发榜那天之前的跟帖都会加上。
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
评论
运行制度正确性的重要性，支持楼主
评论
谢谢，我今天的分都霍霍完了，因为我刚才是一拍脑袋想起发这个帖子的，所以，明天开始的新分，就不乱花了，都加给为孩子们发生的人。
我昨天突然觉得那些孩子好可怜，因为以他们的人生经验和智慧，他们实在也说不出别的话，无法恰当表达其他的情绪。真的是让我很心疼！！！
评论
我还在闹腾呢，没忘哈。支持LZ
评论
今日开始，到公布成绩。我就copy那个留胡子运动，每天必来，每天必给你们就加分
评论
我在找你那个talk show的帖子，不大好找啊
评论
咋找不到你那帖了呢？ 阵亡了？ 你改个title，在顶出来呗。让大家知道你还在继续战斗
评论
这个标题算不算道德绑架？
评论
有人只见道德不见绑架
有人只见绑架不见道德
你不自己绑架自己，局限自己，谁又能绑架得了你？局限得了你？
同时看到道德和绑架的，建议先去治一下精神分裂的病。
评论
因为你骂我是小狗。哼
评论
问题是，不是所有的家长反对这个政策吧
评论
是我给你们加分
你发邮件给教育部，替孩子们申诉一下，我给你加分
评论
这样写可以么？有没有啥重大语法错误？或不通顺的地方？
To who it may concern,
As a fair selection method, all the selection criteria should be clearly revealed before the opening of the enrollment. It will give candidates sufficient time to estimate their chance and decide whether they should put a considerable effort to prepare for the exam.
I strongly disagree with the change of introducing the 'Equity Placement Model' after the exam has already been taken. It leaves those students who might be impacted by the new plan with no choice but to accept the result.
评论
有家长不反对 考完试后改录取规则 这个吗？
我没遇到，但不等于没有。
评论
不扶墙，就服你！妥妥的行动派
我哪里有那个水平
我就把孩子们的话，写上发给他们，就几句。
你写的比我厉害多了
评论
支持，都是为了下一代着想
评论
感谢加分的同学
对那些发邮件的同学，感谢都太轻太轻了
我发这个帖子就希望大家先不要把注意力都放在这次巨大变动的细节，如果追究细节，真是好多话可以说。可是，如果这个变动硬是此次被推出来了，那就是生米熟饭、木成舟。你们的想法再有技术含量，也只不过是嘴架一场。
帖子讨论得那么火，给谁听？
考完试以后都可以改动原录取政策和办法，就这一条如果真实现了，大家就认了无论身处何地，你自己就是永远的韭菜、割头的命吧。
那些觉得自己有钱不是韭菜的，笑话别人的同时问问自己，各大党派输送利益时，给你了吗？没有的话，那你还是根粗壮的韭菜，再扛割，不是葱啊，装什么装？
评论
不在NSW，但支持反对这种做法
评论
谢谢关注和支持
正义不分城界
评论
必须的。
===================================================
Hi there
As a parent of a student who sit for the OC exam on the 28th of July this year, I would like to raise my concerns about the Equity Placement Model for OC and SHS, and I believe my concerns are shared by most if not all parents ( even the students themselves) of the students who have sit the exam this year and will sit the exam in the future.
First, I do agree that we need to support disadvantaged communities and students, however, I strongly disagree it’s fair to cut off 20% of the places from other students and pass it to those who otherwise will not be selected based on their exam marks. Instead, the government should increase the places available for OC and SHS so that more students can access them. This is not much different when we talk about the unemployment rate. The government should create more jobs to lower the unemployment rate instead of having two or more people share one job so that the unemployment rate looks better.
Second, it’s too rushed to apply this new model without consulting the communities, especially those who sit the exam this year, who otherwise could take a different approach if the new model were announced before their application, this includes those from the four categories (low socio-educational advantage backgrounds, Aboriginal, rural and remote locations and disability).
Third, Review of Selective Education Access identified an action plan to deliver a modern, world-class selection system, which is designed to focus on ability not background, however, the Equity Placement Model is completely against this action plan by reserving 20% of the places for those who otherwise have no chance to be selected.
Last not least, without knowing their performance (score and reserve list position) , how could the students know how they did in the exam? How could the parents/students make their choice of whether to wait for the reserve list or go elsewhere (accepting the offer or choosing a private school). As we all know, every year there are students who have got incorrect scores and they successfully got their scores corrected and managed to receive an offer in the end. Without knowing their test scores, how could those students tell whether they should request a results inquiry? Without the test scores but just reserve bands, how can it be transparent that the one at a higher position gets selected before the one at a lower position?
Again, as mentioned earlier, the education system is very critical to a county that wants to stay ahead, we need to have a modern, world-class selection system that can select the most talented students based on their ability but not their background. Those kids who are not able to get into OC or SHS can still make a great contribution to society and the country in a different way. This is no different from the election system for state government or even local council, whoever has the right ability to serve the community better gets elected. Simple as that.
评论
太给力了！
这回复，让人眩晕啊
露相不真人，真人不露相！您既是语言上的巨人，也是行动上的巨人！
评论
发了邮件的同学请进来咳嗽一声
莫作无名英雄，做了好事必须留名，被宣传，被俺加分，让大家蹭个温暖
评论
楼主方便好人做到底，把给ssu的邮件模板贴出来吗？我们发邮件时也简单点:)
评论
捉急你这中文阅读能力啊，楼主的意思是表明他一定会给别人加分的态度，你去抢着当小宠物干什么
评论
不管出发点是否对，考完改规则是完全没有道理的。你们可以组织起来找教育部谈。
评论
有错字，改一下。是country.
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 新西兰总理：出世在新西兰的新纳粹Thomas Sewell是“挺蹩脚的人”，但那是澳洲的问题
- 新西兰总理拉克森称新纳粹Thomas Sewell是坏人，但是没对要求把他从澳大利亚遣返到诞生国去的呼吁置评。
- 撞穿学校栅栏害死十一岁男孩的司机不必坐牢
- 一位女司机撞穿学校栅栏、害死了11岁男孩，被罚2000元罚金、撤消驾照，不必坐牢。Jack Davey 的父母去了