澳洲掐女人的臀部是一种猥亵行为吗？这位法官不这

在澳大利亚澳洲新闻



最近在西澳的一个法庭案件中，地方法官米歇尔•里德利（Michelle Ridley）裁定一名警察掐一名女人的臀部并不是一种猥亵行为。

事情是这样的： 2017年12月，48岁的警官安德鲁•拉姆斯登（Andrew Ramsden）参加了一年一度的轮椅篮球慈善活动。比赛结束后，受害人与警员一起合影。 拉姆斯登认为捏她臀部是一件有趣的事，当他这样做时，她惊讶地向前跳了起来。

根据“刑法”（西澳）第323条，他被控“非法猥亵他人”，但最终被判无罪。

法官认为，现在人们可以轻松看到黄色照片，摸摸屁股不能算猥亵。

一个人的臀部是一个人的身体的私密部位，不可以被人乱摸取乐。

澳大利亚立法者需要明确掐人的臀部是一种性骚扰。 未经同意，这种行为是不可接受的，无论是出于性目的还是出于幽默。 底线是：“不能乱摸别人的屁股,从来都不OK!”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019 ... te-says-no/10967668


评论
好啊，以后掐女人屁股不坐牢了！

评论


关键是看掐女人屁股的是谁吧？
还有被掐的对象，你掐法官的屁股或者法官老婆的屁股试试看……

评论
法官说了，除了老虎的屁股，谁的屁股都可以摸。

评论
都规定了没同意不能乱摸，这个法官明显乱判，可以再上诉

评论
法官男的女的？这样都可以无罪？大家以后没事就掐法官的屁股吧！

评论
判得没错。

属于不合适的无礼行为，但不是非法行为。

unlawfully and indecently assaulting another person" under section 323 of the Criminal Code (WA).

评论
谁起诉的？如果一个普通人报警说有人扭了自己的屁股，警察会起诉吗？

评论
总是掐我女儿小屁股嫩嘟嘟的， 下次要注意。

评论
不算猥亵，那走在街上随便摸?

评论


评论
都不用女人，你掐法官的屁股试试

评论
那 女友或老婆的  也不能摸？

评论
有没有罪判多重全看法官的心情

评论
简直不敢相信法官的逻辑。

评论
听同事说以前公司里有男的拍了女的屁股，被fire的。所以此后男的都很老实

评论
     自由心证,刚好碰到一个比较宽容的法官！

评论
法官是意大利裔？

评论
一个人的臀部是一个人的身体的私密部位， really？

看看现在街上穿的恨不得把屁股整个都露出来给大家欣赏

评论

    就是非礼啊。

评论
wtf???完全无罪吗？啥惩罚都没有吗？？？

评论
哪里都别碰，两指动起来

评论
法官给自己被捏屁股开了绿灯 自己好渴望有人这样对她 又怕有人不敢

Michelle是女的名字

评论

不摸会被起诉。

评论

如果读完整个case..那警察只是在恶作剧罢了。。。老实讲，通过这整个程序，他估计以后都不敢再开这样的玩笑了。。如果因为这个判罪，失去17年的警察生涯，那就太重了

Background and issues raised in the appeal
On 8 December 2017, the respondent, a police officer, participated in a charity wheelchair basketball event, the Anika Coppin Foley Cup, as part of a police team at the Wanangkura Stadium, South Hedland. It was an annual basketball tournament that brought together teams from the Hedland community to raise funds and awareness for disabled athletes.
At the end of the event, the complainant, a member of the public who had participated in the tournament (as a member of the police team) requested a 'serious' photo be taken of her with other members of the police team.
As a group photograph was about to be taken, the respondent ran across the front of the group and did a 'star jump', he then ran and joined the group. The respondent stood next to the right hand side of, and slightly behind, the complainant. Whilst posing for the photograph, the respondent reached across his body with his right hand and pinched the complainant on the side of her right buttock, causing the complainant to jump forward in surprise. Whilst reaching across his body, the respondent said to the complainant 'I hope you take this the right way' or 'don't take this the wrong way'.
It was common ground in the trial before the magistrate, and in the appeal, that the respondent's act constituted an unlawful assault. The sole question before the magistrate, and the question in this appeal, is whether the assault was indecent.
It was not the case for the prosecution that the respondent had a sexual motive for the assault. The appellant accepts that the respondent misguidedly intended his conduct to be in some way humorous, in order to provoke a startled reaction from the complainant for the purpose of introducing some levity into the occasion (photograph). The appellant instead argues that the subjective intention of the respondent is irrelevant to the question of whether the act complained of was indecent.


http://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WASC/2019/84.html

评论

她可以露，你不能摸。

评论

她露是她家的事情
不代表你可以上去摸一把
就好像你家開窗通風不太表我可以溜進去你家

评论
真想知道这些人是怎么当上法官的
澳洲中文论坛热点