澳洲经维州回昆州的女性测试英国变种病毒阳性


在澳大利亚 今天凌晨,在珀斯的Wannanup,警方接到报警有人形迹可疑后,击毙了一名男子。 半夜12:20左右,警方发现这名男子持刀在Rod Court。 警方发声明说,警方命令他把刀放下,他不听,还冲 尽管职位增长弱于预期,失业率下降到了5.4%,这是去年11月以来最低的失业率。 5月份失业率从5.6%下降到了5.4%,失业人数减少了26800人至71万4600人。 但是全职职位减少了20600个,而半职


昆州卫生当局在追踪一位乘坐捷星航班从维州飞到布里斯班的女性的亲密接触者,该女性测试英国变种病毒阳性。

首席卫生官Jeannette Young 说女性12月26日从英国飞到墨尔本,一天后测试阳性。

“她随后被隔离并按要求隔离了10天,一切症状都没有了,被允许分开维州,并在1月5日飞入昆州。”

杨博士说维州卫生当局告诉昆州卫活力构说女性感染的是英国变种。

她昨天在昆州重新测试,发现依然阳性。

“风险是极低的。。。由于她曾经在她感染期的末尾了。”

“假如是普通变种的话我们不会担忧。。。但是由于这是新变种,我们得格外慎重。”

“我们在寻觅她一切的亲密接触者。”

杨博士说该女性1月5日乘坐捷星JQ570航班从墨尔本飞往布里斯班,早晨11点摆布抵达。

接触跟踪者在寻觅在同一班飞机上坐在她前后两排以及摆布的乘客。

当局敦促同机旅客假如有症状就要测试,女性和父母住在阳光海岸的Maleny,所以那里的人如有症状也要测试。

与此同时昆州在布里斯班第一天的封锁中没有发现新的本地病例。

两名布市女子由于违犯违卫生指令被罚1300澳元。

警察在Fortitude Valley接近这两个分别为25和40岁的女子。警方说女子忽视“居家令”并谢绝戴口罩。

卫生厅长Yvette D'Ath 说口罩令适用于人们在车中的状况。

她说卫生官员想要让口罩令“尽量复杂。”

“当你离家就戴上,直到回到家才取下。”

“你离家后就不断得戴着口罩,包罗在车里也是如此。”

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-01-09/coronavirus-queensland-greater-brisbane-lockdown-uk-variant/13043070

评论
各州严密协作,严防漏网的人!

评论
隔离10天?


评论
这是否是说维州的防疫有分明破绽

评论
听说好多患者没有症状当前还会很长工夫的阳性,是否是具感染性就。。。

评论
为甚么是10天?

评论
布市封城该不会实际上是由于她吧?

评论
维省为啥隔离10天就放人?放人之前再测了吗?

评论
“你离家后就不断得戴着口罩,包罗在车里也是如此。”

A10E1BBC-5211-4D88-B5A6-239E4E3100FB.jpeg

评论
出门戴口罩,包罗在车里!这病毒看来很恐惧

评论
隔离10天没有症状就能够坐飞机了?上机前都不再测试一下?

评论
放人合符规则吗?

评论
难道是10个义务日?周末就不论了

评论

维州又玩火了。无症状了就放人,不测试吗?

评论
戴口罩很重要

评论
国际海外回国隔离都14+7+7了

评论

该当是取样当前就末尾算,由于取样到出后果有几天,隔离工夫会减去这几天。好象澳洲都是隔离满14天没有症状不会再测就放人了,最少维州是这样的。

评论
变异病毒感染性更强

评论
吓人,没症状就不测放人了。。。。

评论
14+7需求斟酌了,特别是重灾区来的

评论
维州四周四都是破绽,再次迸发不奇异

评论

为啥只隔离10天?隔离完毕前不检测的吗?破绽呀

本来又是一例阳性后,症状消逝就放人了

评论

新州不是 我伴侣分开酒店的时分还测的

评论

“ 首席卫生官Jeannette Young 说女性12月26日从英国飞到墨尔本,一天后测试阳性。”

“她随后被隔离并按要求隔离了10天,一切症状都没有了,被允许分开维州,并在1月5日飞入昆州。”

从落地mel到分开mel,只隔离了十天。然后dr. Young说维州做的复合流程!看来官方和官方认知的流程是不一样的。

评论
国际不是有复阳又感染别人的吗……关起来一年

评论

26号到墨尔本的,5号就飞走了,怎样算也没到14天。走之前不测,也祸患其它人和地方啊。我们不需求搞砸了,谁谁出来道歉,我们需求一个明晰明白并完全实行的防疫政策。

评论
维州还是不懂无症状感染吗?代价不够大还想再来几波吧

评论
这变种病毒眼看着四周四出没。

评论
哎~ 没完没了

评论
维州流程没有成绩。不要看到维州两个字就很激动。

这个规范是The Communicable Diseases Network Australia guidelines给的,该当全澳洲都是按照这个guideline来的。

看底下这个往事的解释,是新州大红人kerry chant解释的,这规范。可不是维州cho定的。




Why can COVID-19 cases be released from isolation after 10 days? A short explainer


There has been some concern and confusion since this morning's revelations that a positive COVID-19 case was released from isolation in Victoria after just 10 days, and without a negative test.

NSW Chief Health Officer Kerry Chant has explained why that was the case. Essentially, a 14-day quarantine period applies to people who may have been exposed to the virus (such as close contacts or returned travellers) because that is the general incubation period for infection to reveal itself.

But when someone actually has COVID-19, a different isolation requirement sets in. The guidelines were established by the Communicable Diseases Network Australia, and the protocols change depending on whether the person had a mild or serious case.

The returned traveller reported this morning, who first arrived in Victoria and travelled to Queensland, had a mild case of COVID-19. Dr Chant explained what rules applied and why:

"The guidelines require that you have 10 days in isolation after your [COVID-19] symptoms. So you flip from quarantining 14 days to [minimum 10 days] when you are a case.

"For mild cases you were able to be discharged if you were 10 days from your symptom onset and you had been free of symptoms for 72 hours before.

"The reason that was necessary is that we found cases where you can detect the virus in people's noses and throats, three months and even four months after the infection. What we're also observing is sometimes they may be negative at a certain point, but then you get a runny nose or something, and then if you get tested at that time, you can sometimes have the remnants of the virus come out.

"Because of that, you would have people permanently locked up. That's why the Communicable Disease Network looked at the evidence. That was that people are most infectious in that beginning bit, the pre-symptomatic time-frame."

That explains why some people can be released after 10 days so long as they have been free of symptoms for 72 hours. It also explains why a negative test was not required before cases left isolation and entered the community - a positive test at that later stage does not necessarily mean they are still infectious.

"Obviously there is a different set of criteria if you have been hospitalised, there are much more stringent guidelines," Dr Chant said. That different set of criteria also applies to people who were in intensive care or have had more intensive lung involvement.

Of course, these requirements have now shifted in light of the new mutant strains appearing overseas and arriving on Australian shores. "The Communicable Diseases Network Australia guidelines have been renewed and we will further discuss that situation today," Dr Chant said.

But in short: the minimum isolation period for positive mild cases has been lengthened to 14 days and a negative test will be required before people enter the community. Those who still test positive after their symptoms have passed will be assessed on a case-by-case basis.

"In NSW we've now re-instituted PCR testing on all negatives, but we are also making sure that we have the timely genetic genome sequencing, so again that can inform the decision-making," Dr Chant said.

"If you are negative, you will be able to [leave isolation], but we will extend the period to 14 days, not 10 days, as a precaution. We will test you before you go out and if you're negative, we will let you go out.

"If you are positive, we have a case-by-case assessment with experts who will do things like [assess] whether you have antibodies in response, whether the PCR marker is showing whether you're infectious," she said.

Such measures will alter the way that mild COVID-19 cases, such as the woman who travelled to Queensland from Victoria, will be treated in the future.


澳洲新闻