SMH今天的报道，翻译如下。
无论家长们对于My School网站的如何认可，澳洲学校的校长们在一份对于澳洲1000多所学校校长的调查问卷里表达了对My School网站的强烈不满，认为这个网站是失败的。
澳洲教育联盟（Australian Education Union）的这份问卷调查揭示了校长们对My School网站的强烈不满。
参加调查的1166名公立学校校长里的87%说，他们不相信目前结构的My School网站反映了正确的学校表现。
而89%的校长们相信，在每一所学校的收入和师资的细节被列明之前就开通My School网站是个错误。
四分之一的校长们说，他们相信网站上公布的其学校的信息是不正确的。
近90%的校长们说，用相似背景学生来给学校分组的指标（ICSEA）不是一个有效的方法来决定学校是否相似。大部分的校长们相信给他们学校的ICSEA指标是不精确的。
超过60%的校长指责在My School上进行学业成绩的公开比较将导致学校会花更多的精力关注于应付NAPLAN考试。
81%的校长认为学校对于应付NAPLAN考试的更大关注将削弱学校在其他方面的教学。
超过三分之一的校长们认为，自从MySchool今年一月开通以来，他们的学校已经被排名。超过一半的校长说学校被排名会对他们的学生有负面影响，而68%的校长认为排名将会伤害他们的教师员工。
排名垫底学校的校长们更有可能说他们学校已经有教师短缺的问题，现在这个情况变的愈发糟糕了。
澳洲教育联盟（Australian Education Union）的主席Angelo Gavrielatos说，来自于MySchool里学校的排名已经让学生们正在被嘲弄和奚落，而且让学校更难保持教师队伍的稳定。
澳洲教育联盟（Australian Education Union）已经威胁说要抵制今年五月的NAPLAN考试，除非联邦教育部长Julia Gillard采取措施避免公布排名。
Julia Gillard回应说，政府相信澳洲家长们应该知道My School上的信息，包括今年稍后时间将会公布的学校财政信息。
Gillard部长还说，澳洲教育联盟已经很多次清晰地表述了他们对于My School网站的立场。同样澳洲的家长们用对于网站的海量点击（从网站里得到关于其孩子的丰富信息）也非常清晰地表达了他们的立场。
Gillard女士说，我们已经阐述过，政府不支持公布毫无意义的学校排名，My School这个网站设计目的就是要避免这样的事情发生。
[ 本帖最后由 patrickzhu 于 2010-3-25 11:49 编辑 ]
评论
Principals reject My School site
Dan Harrison
March 25, 2010 - 3:00AM
PARENTS may approve of the My School website but principals have given it a fail in a survey of more than 1000 school leaders.
The survey, commissioned by the Australian Education Union, reveals widespread dissatisfaction with the site, which publishes information such as test results, attendance rates and socio-economic profiles for each of the nation's schools.
More than 87 per cent of the 1166 public school principals who responded to the survey said they did not believe the website in its current form presented an accurate picture of school performance, while 89 per cent said they believed it was wrong to launch the site before details of the income and resources of every school were available.
More than a quarter of principals said they believed information published about their school on the site was not correct.
Almost 90 per cent said the index used to group schools serving similar student populations was not a valid way of determining which schools were similar. Most principals believed the index value assigned to their school to be inaccurate.
More than 60 per cent of principals said public comparisons of school results on My School would lead to a greater emphasis on preparation for national literacy and numeracy tests.
Of these principals, 81 per cent said the greater emphasis on test preparation would be at the expense of other areas of teaching and learning.
More than a third of principals said their school had been listed in a league table since the website was launched in January. More than half of these principals said being ranked would have a negative effect on their students, while 68 per cent said the ranking would hurt their staff.
Principals who said their schools had been listed towards the bottom of a league table were more likely to say they had experienced teacher shortages, and more likely to say teacher shortages were becoming worse.
The federal president of the Australian Education Union, Angelo Gavrielatos, said league tables compiled from data on the site had led to students being bullied and taunted, and had made it more difficult for some schools to retain teachers.
The union's leadership will consider the survey findings at a meeting of its federal executive in Canberra today.
The union has threatened to boycott this year's national literacy and numeracy tests, held in May, unless the Deputy Prime Minister, Julia Gillard, takes action to prevent the publication of league tables.
Ms Gillard said the government believed parents should have the information on My School and would build on it over time, including with financial data later this year.
''The AEU has made their position on My School very clear a number of times now,'' she said.
''Parents have made their position very clear as well. They've voted with their fingertips and visited the My School web site to get rich information about their kids' school.''
''As we have said we do not support the publication of meaningless league tables and My School was designed to avoid presenting information in this way.''
This story was found at: http://www.smh.com.au/national/p ... -20100324-qwtq.html
评论
这个是当然，立场不同
评论
屁股，屁股...
评论
脑袋，脑袋。。。
评论
以后他们的KPI里面不免会有这些，他们当然不干啦！
评论
虽然myschool 对我个人来说是得益者， 不过我同意校长们
评论
把楼上的拖出去
评论
他们也有他们的point，本来评价学校这事就很复杂
重要的是现在myschool出来了，它的优点和缺点都开始变得清晰，下一步该怎么样发展，而学校和相关的部门又怎么应对
评论
我屁股赞同my school， 脑袋反对， 不过屁股是由脑袋控制， 没办法
评论
不要这样！！！！！！！
没了它，我拿什么找房子啊
评论
灌版的中文在哪个学校学的，太强了，推荐一下
评论
“81%的校长认为学校对于应付NAPLAN考试的更大关注将削弱学校在其他方面的教学。”能不能既关注NAPLAN考试又不要削弱学校在其他方面的教学，难道学校对自己的要求这么低，2个不矛盾的事情非要2选一？
评论
跟 4# 的武大 和5#的交大 学的
评论
晕啊。。。
评论
不知道MY SCHOOL 网站是不是会在不久的将来消失
在他们炸楼前，我先备份去
评论
MY SCHOOL 网站即使消失了也没关系了，在已经有了足够多的讨论和信息，对于这里的大部分人来说，够用好几年的了，呵呵。
评论
反正选parramatta rd 以北就不会错
评论
媒体什么时候发个《澳洲家长们对My School网站的好评如潮》的对应文章啊
评论
Gelen很着急，呵呵。
你来具体说说，MySchool对你的帮助到底有多大？
评论
干版这就说绝了，leichhardt那个在路的北边，烂得很，不过小朋友出去讨个酒可能倒是方便
评论
我儿子学校校长给每个家长写了封信,怎么正确看待MY SCHOOL
评论
同上， 几乎每次的newsletter里都有提到myschool网站的不完整性
评论
以前学校对于report什么的都不慌不忙的，很多学校非等到4月deadline才肯做自己的report。今年就不行了，个个都赶着上report写信，加班加点在所不惜的大有人在。
评论
是如何评价呢？
旋木也可以来转述下newsletter的内容吧。
评论
我没仔细看
下次我贴上来， 反正每期的都有
评论
怎么看某个学校的排名阿？
评论
My School上只有数据，没有排名。
排名是悉尼的SMH排的NSW的学校。
评论
我们那个可是父母每人一封EMAIL到信箱,再寄到家里,从来没有这么隆重过的.NEWSLETTER家长还可看可不看,每人一封信,还以为发生什么大事了,不看也不行.
评论
MYSCHOOL对悉尼和墨尔本影响确实比较大，其它地区其实反应平淡，这两个地区种族对立贫富分化有一定程度了。
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年，华人区受影响！只能乘巴士（组图）
- 据《逐日电讯报》报导，从明年年中开始，因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
- 联邦政客们具有多少房产？
- 据本月早些时分报导，绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联