澳洲How to keep a home capital gains tax free?

在澳大利亚税务




How to keep a home capital gains tax free when building, repairing or renovating, 03 December 2013


By Anthony J Cordato, Business and Property Lawyer, Cordato Partners Lawyers

Building, repairing or renovating a home has a special place in Australian tax law because the home can be treated as owner-occupied before the work is finished, even though it is unoccupied.


In technical terms, the main residence exemption from capital gains tax is able to be extended to cover the period before the building, repair or renovation work on the property is finished.


This is known as the construction concession. It is available in situations where a new home is built on vacant land, where an old house is knocked down and rebuilt, and where the owner moves out during a repair or renovation.


Three Administrative Appeal Tribunal (AAT) decisions are examined in this article. In each, the rules for the construction concession were not followed and capital gains tax was payable on the proceeds of sale.


The construction concession — building, repairing or renovating a dwelling as a main residence

The law on the main residence exemption is found in s 118-100 to 118-265 in Subdiv 118-B of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (ITAA 1997). This is a summary:


You can ignore a capital gain … you make from a CGT event that happens to a dwelling that is your main residence.

ITAA 1997 requires the owner to be in occupation of the main residence to be capital gains tax free, but does allow the main residence exemption to be extended in some instances.


Section 118-150 is one instance. It allows for the main residence exemption to be extended until building, repair or renovation work is finished.


Section 118-150 contains a four-year time limit for the owner to move in. If it is land, or a house to be demolished, the time limit is four years after the date of settlement of the purchase/transfer of title. If it is an existing dwelling to be repaired or renovated, the time limit is four years after the moving out date.


Section 118-150(3) contains para (a) and (b) with these requirements:

(a) the moving in quickly requirement — the owner must move into occupation of the house as soon as practicable after the construction work is finished, and

(b) the occupation requirement — the owner must then continue to occupy the house as their main residence for at least three months.



Unless both requirements are satisfied, the construction concession is not available. Therefore capital gains tax would be payable on the increase in value before the date the owner moves in.


If the taxpayer already has another principal place of residence, then they must choose between that residence and the new residence, which one is to be their main residence for capital gains tax purposes.


Recently, the AAT has ruled on para (b), to add to two earlier rulings it has made on the construction concession. The AAT interprets the requirements strictly.


The moving in quickly requirement — s 118-150(3)(a)

In the decision of Summers v FC of T 2008 ATC ¶10-007, the AAT ruled that the taxpayer had not moved in as soon as reasonably practicable.


The facts were that Gail Summers settled on the purchase of vacant land in Kallista, Victoria on 1 November 1996. She contracted to build a dwelling on the land in June 2002. She terminated the building contract in September 2002, before the dwelling was built. Four months later, in January 2003, she took up occupation of a two-room shed on the property which the builder had built for storage and a lunch room. It had mains water and a toilet connected. After four months, she moved out, and later on, sold the property.


The AAT ruled that she had not “moved in as soon as practicable” because she had delayed four months. The AAT found that Summers had no intention of living in the shed in September 2002, and that she moved in January 2003 only after a disagreement with the person with whom she shared rental accommodation. The AAT noted Summer’s “unusual working and living habits” — such as buying all meals (no need for a kitchen) and showering at work (no need for a shower), and ruled that the shed could be treated as her main residence by Summers from the date she moved in, even though it was rudimentary in terms of living conditions.


The consequence of the failure to comply with the moving in quickly requirement was harsh. Summers was unable to use the construction concession for the four years preceding January 2003, during which time the value of the property rose substantially. The main residence exemption was available to her because she occupied the property for a minimum of three months, but only from January 2003. The AAT calculated that a net capital gain of $64,858 from the sale of a property was to be included as taxable income.


The occupation requirement — s 118-150(3)(b)

In the decision of Keep v FC of T [2013] AATA 709, the AAT ruled that there was insufficient evidence of occupation for either the construction concession or the main residence exemption to be available.


The facts were that James Keep bought the land in Scarborough, Western Australia in July 2002 and commenced construction of a house in April 2004. According to Keep, he moved in when the house was finished in May or June 2005, and moved out in early September 2005 to live with his sister in Queensland. The house was sold in November 2005.


Keep’s share of the net capital gain was $132,542, which after applying the 50% discount, became $66,271 to be included as taxable income.


The AAT ruled that Keep had not proved he moved into or occupied the house as a main residence. The AAT considered these factors —

• Length of time — Keep’s own evidence was that he lived in the house “approximately three months”, which was not “at least three months”

• Mailing address — Keep’s driver’s licence, tax return for 2004/05 and mailing address during the relevant period (June to September 2005) nominated his sister’s address in Queensland as his residential address

• Personal belongings — These remained in his sister’s house in Queensland

• Services — No utility bills addressed to Keep at the house address were produced. Council Rates and Water Rates Notices which had property address were of little value, and documents created on the sale with the property address were afterthoughts

• Intention to occupy — Keep worked as a fly-in fly-out mine worker. He was away from the house in the two weeks he worked and had no proof that he was living at the house in the one week off

• Supporting evidence — Keep did not obtain a statement from his former de facto partner (they separated in September 2004) who was a joint owner and who he said cohabited in the house “as friends” from June to September.



As a consequence, neither the construction concession nor the main residence exemption was available and capital gains tax was payable.


The Keep decision fleshes out the AAT decision of Erdelyi & Anor v FC of T 2007 ATC 2214 in which the AAT ruled that the occupation requirement was not satisfied because the taxpayers had not occupied the house as their main residence.


The relevant facts were that the house had been built to lock-up stage, and landscaping and swimming pool work were in progress; only basic furnishings and household items had been moved into the house; most of their furniture and personal belongings remained at the house they had been living in; there was no refrigerator or washing machine; they used the toilet and shower, but not the kitchen stove (which was missing the top plates); electricity was connected but usage of $10 per month demonstrated minimal usage; and no evidence was provided of mail delivery, or of notifying relevant authorities or institutions of the change of address.


Conclusion

The devil is in the detail.


When building, repairing or renovating a house which is intended to be used as a main residence, it is necessary:

(a) to move in as soon as practicable after the work is completed, and

(b) to occupy the house as a main residence for at least three months



to take advantage of the construction concession from capital gains tax.


Proper records must be kept because the onus of proof is on the taxpayer.

澳洲中文论坛热点
悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年,华人区受影响!只能乘巴士(组图)
据《逐日电讯报》报导,从明年年中开始,因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
联邦政客们具有多少房产?
据本月早些时分报导,绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联

税务

税务

人工智能帮我报税,强大得我都呆了

澳大利亚今年报税有大不同,主要是大量使用了AI 极大地简化了我的流程,以前报税,都是一一手算对比 现在,下载全部的银行记录为csv文件,然后让人工智能替我分析,比如核对房租收入的, ...

税务

Super节约税小tip

澳大利亚Contribute unconcessional contribution in July and file claim in June next year. This way, the gain will not be taxed 15% You can save hundreds dollar if you contribute $10000 评论 不是 gain 不扣税,而是这 15% 的tax 是在你提交 ...

税务

卖了房子交2万到super怎么操作

澳大利亚打工人卖了房子, 在去会计师那退税前交2万到super还算24-25 年期间吗?有什么该注意的地方 课避免多交税? 评论 太晚了 评论 明天就6月30日了,怎么着也来不及了。 评论 一般要提前一 ...

税务

NZ非税务居民在NZ的美股平台投资

澳大利亚我在NZ的银行有些存款,在NZ的Hatch Invest上买了些美股,因不是NZ的税务居民,美股的分红都已扣过税(美国与NZ的税务协议),在填写IRD的报表时,没找到有Overseas Income的选项,是不是美 ...

税务

Tax invoice 没有gst,还能退税吗

澳大利亚投资房修补,付现金给tradie, 对方给了tax invoice, 但没有GST, 我担心因为这个invoice上面没有GST, 就变成一张无效发票,会导致我无法退个人税吗 评论 我的理解是有receipts就可以了,做投资 ...

税务

Division 293 和 concessional contribution

澳大利亚大家好,我想问一下division 293的那个income是怎么计算的? 假设我税前income是20w,雇主打的super是2w(比例不对 但这样简单些方便理解),这时候因为前几年有剩很多unused concessional contr ...

税务

投资房在老婆名下,老公可以用来负扣税吗

澳大利亚请问有个投资房只写了老婆的名字,但是老公的收入比较高,目前房子是负现金流,请问可以在老公这边做负扣税吗? 评论 no 评论 no 评论 否 评论 如果只考虑负扣税,听说夫妻是可以 ...

税务

关于配偶Taxable income报税的疑问

澳大利亚是这样的,老公去年有一笔personal super contribution, 他自己的报税单上taxable income把这笔super contribution的钱减掉了,我自己的报税单上配偶收入那一栏填得是老公的taxable income,就是跟老公 ...

税务

要打脸了,我可能搞错了

澳大利亚楼里有个朋友说我搞错了 我用的是税后的收入打进去的,我打进去了3万,当即扣了15%的税,然后给会计申报的时候,我申报了3万的Personal superannuation contributions,都是5年之内的carry f ...

税务

Carry forward concessional contribution

澳大利亚为了减税,今年第一次自己往的super转钱, 然后交了notice of intention tax deduction form给我的super. 请问ATO怎么知道我现在的contribution是记在Carry forward concessional contribution, 而不是今年的。 评论 ...

税务

自住投资房一个问题

澳大利亚哈哈 我又来了,请教大家 假设我现在一个自住,一个投资房。等到多年以后搬到投资房里住,然后把自住的卖掉。卖掉的自住要交CGT吗? 评论 六年法则了解一下 评论 好的谢谢我去看 ...

税务

关于补缴Super的几点疑问,求教

澳大利亚我想把过去5年剩余的carried forward concessional contribution额度都交完,但有几点问题不太明白,请会计朋友帮忙解答: 1. 因为剩下只有两个月,工资收入无法补齐所有的剩余额度,所以我需 ...

税务

与工作相关的费用扣税减免问题

澳大利亚印象中,这些费用少于300刀,无需发票, 今天收到ATO邮件,明确提出 需要发票。 让人很迷惑。 评论 Remember, to claim a deduction for any work expense: you must have spent the money yourself the expense mus ...

税务

新建家庭小公司,请教如何分配公司利润

澳大利亚2324年公司应纳税收入11191.交了2797.5的税。 2425年 公司directer已经发了工资收入45000 公司预计还有26000利润,是否应该分点红给director 呢?听说再分红11191.可以把2797.5的税领回来。 评论 ...

税务

作为solo trade如何税务最大化避税?

澳大利亚solo trade 怎么样才能税务最大化避税? 评论 super 评论 您說最大化指交最多稅嗎? 评论 最大化避税 评论 转移海外 评论 一定买好各种保险,不同于公司,个体户属于无限责任,自己的 ...