There is no greater confirmation of the Liberal Party’s inability to learn from its mistakes than a re-read of its 2022 election review.
Such reviews are a convention on both sides of politics, and they (should) serve a sound purpose: the prosaic and simple purpose of learning history so as not to repeat it.
The 2022 review, undertaken by former party director Brian Loughnane and Senator Jane Hume,包含许多段落，这些段落可以被切割并粘贴到Next 审查中，涵盖了自由主义者刚刚遭受的毁灭性损失。
自由派参议员Jane Hume和前党总监Brian Loughnane回顾了自由党的2022年损失。“ ZO2UY”> CRECTER：ALEX ELLENDHAUSEN/ALEX ELLENHHAUSEN/LOUISE KENNENLEY/lOULISE KENNERLEY Inter Inter
读。 blunt follow-up: “No party that is seeking to form government has a pathway to a majority solely through rural and regional electorates.”
Further: “Liberal Party performed particularly poorly with female voters, continuing a trend that has been present since the election of 1996.”
This is a kind way of saying that its share of the female vote has been falling for nearly two decades, with no serious attempts to arrest the decline. No acknowledgment, outside this review, that the lady-vote is not a boutique item, not an interest group or a minority to be pandered to, but instead, that it represents the numerical majority of voters.
AdvertisementAlso from the 2022 review: “A significant审查的大量提交的数量引用了自由党在2022年选举中的决定性因素，这是从该党的研究和选举后分析中明确的，该党与妇女的地位是该党失败的重要因素。
媒体=“（最小宽度：1024px）” srcset =“ https://static.ffx.io/images/qunzoom_0.394%2c$ multiply_0.9788%2C$ ratio_1.5%2C$ WIDT H_756％2C $ x_0％2C $ y_0/t_crop_custom/q_86％2CF_AUTO/8F17F904B1036DA08EC5DEC9CD51E2E2E98E1EE1EE6DF， https://static.ffx.io/images/qunzoom_0.394%2c$ multiply_1.9577%2C$ ratio_1.5%2C$ WIDTH_75 6％2C $ x_0％2C $ y_0/t_crop_custom/q_62％2CF_AUTO/8F17F904B1036DA08EC5DEC9CD51E2E98E1EE1EE6DF 2x“高度=“ 494”宽度=“ 740”/>Scott Morrison’s defeat in 2022 prompted an internal review that found the Liberal Party “performed particularly poorly with female voters”.Credit: James Brickwood
Add the statement: “Liberal defectors in ‘Teal席位非常有可能同意“自由党中对妇女的待遇或态度对我的投票产生强大的影响”。或者：“在选举之后，明显的澳大利亚人（在不同的选民中）同意‘自由党落后于澳大利亚中部的观点。
的候选人的预选。副自由主义者苏珊·莱（Sussan Ley）在星期五宣布了她的候选人资格。您可以阅读自由主义者的内部冲突：我们知道我们对妇女做了不好的工作，并且我们知道我们需要将她们提升为领导地位。但是，我们不能让印象以晋升为领导地位，因为她们是女性。
在澳大利亚和国外，政治的保守方面一直很难接受女权主义的价值观。在其最新的右季度中，妇女主要是因为她们作为家庭主妇和母亲的角色而受到重视，并不愿意让某些女性可以提供公共领域的东西。
朱莉·毕晓普（Julie Bishop）当时校长托尼·阿伯特（Tony Abbott德鲁·梅里斯（Drew Meares）
前总理托尼·阿伯特（Tony Abbott）最终提出了一项替代婚姻休产假政策，并解释说，不应将妇女教育不应高等教育，只能剥夺职业，只能剥夺一个职业。他在2013年说。
在2014年，外交事务的少数人朱莉·毕晓普（Julie Bishop）拒绝了自己的标签“女权主义者”。
“我不需要以这种方式自我描述，”她对国家新闻俱乐部进行了自我描述。几天”。
她说，如果她的职业生涯中没有解决问题，她永远不会“责备我是女人”。
加载
，但是，除了她的性别之外，很难解释她的性别来解释为什么从未被她（Maperitial partion of Pare of Pare of Pare of Parity）解释为何从未认真对待Bishop的领导者。 positions) through the effective implementation of quotas.
The right side of politics has an anathema for the Q word, even though Liberals have, for years now, tentatively used the more gentle word “targets” to assert they are onto the problem of the gross under-representation of women in their ranks.
The Liberals should be the party of aspiration, and the party of peak economic productivity.配额是有生产力的 - 从某种意义上说，它们工作很快。 Why is that F-word so ubiquitous, while the other one is so difficult for Liberals to utter?
Jacqueline Maley is a columnist and senior writer.