澳洲Sam哥聊租赁:商业租约租客不付租的案例分析
在澳大利亚 请教一下:土地成本10,400,000,subdivided做了15块地,57个townhouse。销售额大概45,000,000。建房成本(含三通费用)15,000,000,中介费广告费2,000,000。毛利$17,600,000。不知道我计算的成本是否正 日前随中介去看一农场,女农场主的父亲也到场协助介绍。他约近60岁,浓浓的澳洲乡音,古铜的肤色,宽边的牛皮毡帽,朴实健谈。谈到地区,他说是在本地出生长大的,他的农场2
真实没有工夫,这个文章本来是发给外部商业租约客户的,所以用了英文。我记得本来这里翻译的大神很多,甘心贡献的可以帮助翻译一下。但请务转载再其他未经我赞同的地方。谢谢。
Background:
Followed by the decisions of the National Cabinet to support the tenants and landlords through the coronavirus pandemic by reforming the residential and commercial tenancy laws, Victoria has passed the Commercial Tenancy Relief Scheme(CTRS). (please check my previous article about how the code apply to the rent relief calculation) and this Scheme further extended to 28 March 2021.
PS Market Pty Ltd v Brijcam Nominees Pty Ltd (Building and Property) [2020] VCAT 1468 (24 December 2020) A recent ruling from VCAT has provided excellent insight into how VCAT interpreting the code and regulation.
In this case, the landlord served the breach notice to the tenant and followed by re-entering the property to forfeit the lease. The tenant then, brought this application to VCAT seeking to stop the landlord to re-enter the property since CTRS in place and reinstate the lease.
Result: VCAT does not consider the lease is under protection if it is not an “eligible lease”, which does not think the tenant under the protection of the Act.
My observation:
To determine if the lease is an “eligible lease” VCAT applies strictly form in section 13 of the Act (as amended by s 4 of the Amending Act). It does not consider if the group of companies which other company/parent company/umbrella company are eligible to the job keep, it has to be the tenant company itself.
Reference:
PS Market Pty Ltd v Brijcam Nominees Pty Ltd (Building and Property) [2020] VCAT 1468 (24 December 2020)
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bi ... VCAT/2020/1468.html
Meaning of the eligible lease
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bi ... oma2020334/s13.html
过户律师,悉尼,买房卖房合同,看合同,conveyancer,律师,房产过户