O.P.
雇主能否代表雇员做出非专业超级捐款，而这是超级担保的补充，并且不为雇员的$ 30K优惠费用做出贡献吗？例如就像奖金超级付款
阅读ATO网站后，我相信他们可能被称为“雇主 - 自愿”捐款，雇主不能向他们征收任何税款。这是正确的吗？ this specific payment is non-concessional.
I believe they can, our payroll has an option for it on a super contribution form (i've never done it), but that's a large company with a significant payroll department.
评论
Yeah, they can.
My wife does this as QLD government doesn’t do salary sacrifice for her role so she then does a notice of intent at the end of一年。
arc888写信...
我试图确定我的雇主是否总是将任何超级付款视为优惠的捐款，或者他们是否可以说这笔特定的付款是非付款的。优惠。他们代表您将其转发给超级基金，这不是雇主的贡献。
所有雇主的贡献都是优惠的。
o.p.
nk56写信...
优惠限制将被超过，我只需要就超额付费缴纳额外税。我没有任何未使用的携带优惠供款，也可以用来抵消该金额。哦，好！arc888写信...
雇主能否代表雇员代表雇员
做出非兴趣的超级贡献
除了较小的行政上的付费，而不是您的雇员付款，而不是您的付费，而不是您的付款方式，而不是您的付费，而不是您的付款方式，而不是您一度重要的是您的行为。沉积？
o.p.
我没有选择。必须通过超级。
arc888写入...
我别无选择。
，
虽然您的确切情况尚不清楚，但我认为，当您在行政上不超过您的cod cap cap cap your cocc cap n your cocc cap n you coc
，如果您在ccc cap cap a的cap cap a的范围都超过了
file your tax return.
If you are at your TBC, and so have a zero NCC cap, then you can just withdraw the excess CC's that are converted to NCCs retroactively.
So the end result will be the same as if they were put in as NCCs in the first place – assuming you were going to max your CCs in any case (and I can't think of a reason why you wouldn't want to）。
john_s写道...
，最终结果将与他们首先放入nccs
是的，是的，这是从所得税的角度进行的，但是他们在超级贡献中的分类不断，他们仍然会变化，而他们却不在范围 component.
评论
this post was edited
NK56 writes...
Yes this is correct from an income tax perspective but the classification of the excess concessional contributions does not change in the super fund
If that is important then, for a little more administrative hassle, you can withdraw the excess CC (an option that exists regardless of your NCC cap然后tsb），然后重新构造为NCC
澳洲中文论坛热点
- 悉尼部份城铁将封闭一年，华人区受影响！只能乘巴士（组图）
- 据《逐日电讯报》报导，从明年年中开始，因为从Bankstown和Sydenham的城铁将因Metro South West革新名目而
- 联邦政客们具有多少房产？
- 据本月早些时分报导，绿党副首领、参议员Mehreen Faruqi已获准在Port Macquarie联系其房产并建造三栋投资联